Dave Holmes & Blake Poland “Celebrating Risk”
Holmes, Dave; Poland, Blake 2009. Celebrating Risk: The Politics of Self-Branding, Transgression & Resistance in Public Health. – Aporia Vol. 1 No. 4: 27-36
[…] the branding of oneself arises from a need to display one’s “transgressive” identity with the ultimate (intended) goal of defying the dominant public health discourse. Marking one’s own body becomes a means of taking possession of it in order to use it as a locus not only of suffering but also of pleasure and rebellion. (28)
[…] we argue, branding the self, as an act of defiant resistance, also necessarily, if unwittingly, serves to consolidate the imbrications of the self in the social, perpetuating some of the same power relations transgressors seek to challenge and disrupt. (28)
We deliberately chose the expression branding as opposed to body transformation to underscore that we do not see a radical break from use of wearing of brand logo clothing, and other means of displaying physical capital, but rather a continuum of possibilities for the construction and display of identity, aesthetics / politics of the self. (29)
Contrary to aesthetic affirmation, branding could mean extreme dissidence from society or be a reflection of an extreme form of resistance to social directives. In this way, the body is intended to be a surface on which to display markings that also show a radical refusal of the conditions of existence (skinheads and punks, for example). (32)
Desires and pleasures, like power, constitute a positive force that can be expressed under the form of resistance. Deleuze and Guattari[48] suggest that social norms attempt to exercise their power by marking (mapping) and shaping the body. In this schema, the body is not a collection of organs, but an inscriptive body. Much like a political map, where most geological realities of the area are obscured to the mercy of political borders, the body is a ‘political surface’ on which laws, social values and moral predicaments are inscribed.[49] (32)
The body and its surfaces are a medium where identity is both enacted as well as socially patrolled. Branding practices respond to and are shaped by the larger social context that shapes the bodies in question. (32)
One of the paradoxes of a risk-averse (and safer) society therefore is a growing (albeit minority) segment of society that increasingly feels the need to seek out ever more dangerous risks. It is in the flirting with death that some feel most fully alive. (33)
The question is how a reflexive public health can best deal with the phenomenon of resistance, so as to not unnecessarily feed it. […] If the exertion of power inevitably produces resistance which in turn ‘produces’ reactions from the authorities, is there any way out of the vicious circle? (33)
In terms of Public Health practice, a shift from moralistic (and often stigmatizing) intervention designs (campaigns) toward an approach of solidarity (understanding and acceptance of the other), is, we feel, imperative if we wish to avoid pushing resistance to further extremes. (34)